🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has claimed to have scraped a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is preparing to publish them online.

Potential Boost for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts noted the seeming leak could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for material to develop their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of associated data such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have located and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” said a company representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a third party collected public metadata and employed illicit methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Stated Goal and Worries

The streaming service does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would likely be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced data is sadly widespread in the tech sector, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a huge online repository of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that individuals of the public could in principle “create their own personal free version of the service”. He added it could also enable tech companies to “educate models on modern music at a large volume”.

Copyright has become a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Considerations and Responses

In the UK, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government suggestion to let AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Almost every participant to a government consultation on the proposal has supported artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for technology, innovation and technology informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.